By Aubrey Wieber
Salem Reporter, February 25, 2019

Last week, testimony on a vaccine bill got support from testifiers as being informative, but rebuke from doctors saying it would mislead the public and scare them of vaccinations. On Friday, a bill that would eliminate nonmedical exemptions to vaccines for public school children was introduced.

Introducing vaccine-related legislation is the political equivalent of swatting a hornets’ nest.

Regardless of what the legislation does, it’s guaranteed to bring out emotional and passionate advocates.

That was the case last week, when a bill that would require medical professionals to give more information before immunizing a patient had a hearing in the Senate Committee on Health Care. The bill is seen as supporting so-called “anti-vaxxers” though supporters say the goal is to provide more information.

Federal law requires parents and patients receive a sheet from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. It distills the benefits and risks of getting vaccines to two pages in a way that’s supposed to be understandable for the average parent.

But those sheets don’t include other information, such as the ingredients in the vaccines. Senate Bill 649 would change that. It would require the Oregon Health Authority to maintain a webpage with information on the ingredients of vaccines and their dangers. That same information would be given by medical professionals to patients in a packet before a child is vaccinated.

The bill was introduced on behalf of Oregonians for Medical Freedom, an advocacy group that opposes mandated vaccines and doubts their safety. It is sponsored by state Senators Kim Thatcher, R-Keizer; Dennis Linthicum, R-Klamath Falls; Tim Knopp, R-Bend; Brian Boquist, R-Dallas; and state Representatives Mike Nearman, R-Independence; Ron Noble, R-McMinnville; and Duane Stark, R-Grants Pass.

Vaccinations have been successful in eradicating dangerous diseases, such as measles. Over the past two decades, skeptics about the safety of vaccines have grown into a small but vocal movement. There are fears that vaccines can cause autism, though that theory has been repeatedly debunked by researchers.

When unvaccinated rates climb near 10 percent or higher, the risk of an outbreak greatly increases. Nearly all who’ve contracted measles during the current Vancouver, Washington, outbreak were unvaccinated. The measles vaccine is 97 percent effective, according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention.

Sarah Bacon, executive director of Oregonians for Medical Freedom, testified that the goal is to give patients the kind of medical information someone would get with other medication, such as insulin.

Bacon was backed up by dozens of parents, who testified in person or wrote in support of the bill.

But a panel of doctors oppose the legislation, saying this was a scare tactic and a way of confusing parents. The existing federal fact sheet is easily understood, but a large packet with page after page of medical jargon won’t help inform anyone, they said.

An example is the ingredient list the bill would require doctors to give patients. Paul Lewis, the Multnomah County health officer and a pediatrician of 31 years, said the list includes formaldehyde, a chemical used in embalming. A reasonable person could see that as dangerous.

“Your body continuously produces, and eliminates, formaldehyde,” Lewis said. “The trace amount of formaldehyde present in some vaccines is far less than the amount already present in the body. Any small amounts of formaldehyde in vaccines is promptly detoxified and excreted. The implementation of this bill will frighten parents about a naturally occurring chemical and burden health care providers with having to give a lengthy explanation about a vaccine component with no health risk.”

Paul Cieslak, medical director for communicable diseases and immunizations for the Oregon Health Authority, said giving a list of potentially dangerous ingredients without saying the level at which they become dangerous is misleading.

“You can’t divorce chemical from the quantity when you’re trying to consider how harmful it is,” he said.

The bill received written testimony from 59 people. After expert testimony, 23 citizens signed up to testify, though there was only time for a handful to talk for a minute a piece before the hearing ended.

The crowd was lively, with people often dramatically shaking their heads at testimony from the doctors, and at times verbally objecting to Lewis’ statements.

The issue is popping up at a time when vaccinations are on the minds of many Oregonians. A measles outbreak in Washington has 66 confirmed cases.

Washington and Oregon public health officials and political leaders have called on citizens to get vaccinated, saying it’s the most effective way to prevent outbreaks.

“At a time when we are responding to the largest measles outbreak in the 22 years I’ve been in Oregon, I think anything that contributes to the fear of parents, inaccurate information about vaccines, we should oppose,” Lewis said.

The bill has no further scheduled testimony, but if it does move out of committee it will likely need some amendments, according to testimony. Part of it conflicts with state law outlining when a teen gets autonomy over their medical decisions.

The legislation doesn’t say whether the new vaccine information would be given in physical form or patients would get the website address. One witness said the group was asking for a one-page document with instructions to find more information online, but that isn’t reflected in the bill.  

Jonathan Lockwood, spokesman for Thatcher and Linthicum, said Thatcher is looking at an amendment to the bill to clear that up.

Lockwood said Thatcher has worked with Bacon and Oregonians for Medical Freedom for several years, and the bill is not motivated by an anti-vaccination mentality.

“I think the biggest thing is people just want access to the same information they would have with optional drugs,” Lockwood said.

Senate Bill 649’s controversy is likely just a preview of what may happen with legislation introduced Friday by state Rep. Mitch Greenlick which would remove nonmedical exemptions for kids in public schools. Right now, parents with children in public school can claim a religious or philosophical exemption to vaccinating their children. Under Greenlick’s proposal, the only way to avoid vaccinating a child headed to school would be with a doctor’s note stating there is a legitimate medical reason to avoid vaccinations. Parents against vaccinations could still home school their children.

In 2018, 94 percent of Oregon K-12 students had all their vaccinations. But individual pockets exist throughout the state where fewer than 80 percent of students have all their vaccinations, according to state data. Many of those pockets are in and around Multnomah County.

Greenlick , D-Portland, said he knows he’s stepping into controversy, but his proposal is backed by the best available science. He said having a philosophical exemption to vaccinations is “ridiculous.”

“I think we’ve reached a level that’s far too dangerous in terms of people who’ve exempted themselves,” Greenlick said.

Oregon Health Authority usually does not take a stance on legislation outside of concepts put forth by the agency, and until Greenlick’s bill did not take a stance on other vaccine-related bills.

The agency diverted from the norm when telling Salem Reporter this weekend it supports Greenlick’s bill, calling it evidence-based and something that will protect the public.

“Oregon’s 94 percent childhood immunization rate leaves too many schools and communities lacking the resilience they need to safeguard against preventable disease outbreaks – and the harms these outbreaks can cause,” said spokesman Robb Cowie. “Aligning our state’s immunization laws with less permissive laws in other states will increase vaccination rates here in Oregon and protect more people and communities.”

A similar effort failed in 2015, but Greenlick said the measles outbreak in Vancouver has made a theoretical problem a real one, and he thinks this time he legislative support will be there. He said he’s taken hundreds of calls, evenly split in favor and against tightening vaccination exemptions, before introducing his legislation. 

Reporter Aubrey Wieber: or 503-575-1251. Wieber is a reporter for Salem Reporter who works for the Oregon Capital Bureau, a collaboration of EO Media Group, the Pamplin Media Group, and Salem Reporter.